A federal judge on Friday prohibited President Trump from tapping $2.5 billion in military funding to build high-priority segments of his prized border wall in California, Arizona and New Mexico. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. in Oakland acted in two lawsuits filed by California and by activists who contended that the money transfer was unlawful and that building the wall would pose environmental threats.

“All President Trump has succeeded in building is a constitutional crisis, threatening immediate harm to our state,” said California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who led a 20-state coalition of attorneys general in one lawsuit.

Speaking Saturday at a press conference marking the end of the Group of 20 summit in Osaka, Japan, Mr. Trump called the decision “a disgrace.”

“So we’re immediately appealing it and we think we’ll win the appeal,” he went on to say. “There was no reason that that should have happened. And a lot of wall is being built.”

The decisions are in line with Gilliam’s ruling last month that blocked work from beginning on two of the highest-priority projects — one spanning 46 miles in New Mexico and another covering 5 miles in Yuma, Arizona.

But the fight is far from over. The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to take up the same issue of using military money next week.

At issue is Mr. Trump’s February declaration of a national emergency so that he could divert $6.7 billion from military and other sources to begin construction of the wall, which could have begun as early as Monday.

Mr. Trump declared the emergency after losing a fight with the Democratic-led House that led to a 35-day government shutdown.

The president identified $3.6 billion from military construction funds, $2.5 billion from Defense Department counterdrug activities and $600 million from the Treasury Department’s asset forfeiture fund.

The judge Friday didn’t rule on funding from the military construction and Treasury budgets.

In the second suit, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, the judge determined that the use of the $2.5 billion for two sectors of the wall was unlawful, although he rejected environmental arguments that wall construction would threaten species such as bighorn sheep.

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

GOP Senate candidate aims to beat Cory Booker in 2020: ‘We are going to remove him from politics’

Fox News Flash top headlines for Jan. 3 are here. Check out what’s clicking on Foxnews.com Republican Senate candidate Hirsh Singh says he can easily defeat incumbent Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., in 2020 by appealing to disillusioned minority voters, and exposing the…

New transcript raises huge questions about Mike Pompeo’s denial that he retaliated against fired inspector general

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has claimed that his recommendation to fire an inspector general who was investigating him couldn’t possibly have been retaliatory, because he did not even know about the investigation. But newly revealed testimony from the inspector…

5 of the most tense moments from last night’s State of the Union

Pelosi claims ripping Trump’s speech was ‘courteous’; reaction and analysis on ‘The Five.’ The U.S. Capitol was tense Tuesday night as President Trump delivered his highly anticipated State of the Union address. Here are five of the most stressful moments…

Charles Payne: New Yorkers are fleeing de Blasio’s policies, homeless crisis in ‘droves’

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio‘s “terrible policies” have worsened the coronavirus pandemic’s devastating impact on the once-bustling Big Apple as families are leaving in “droves,” Fox News contributor Charles Payne told “America’s Newsroom” Wednesday. The host of “Making Money with Charles…