“Iran was on a pathway to acquiring a nuclear weapon provided by the nuclear deal,” said Mike Pompeo, discussing U.S. strategy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuke

Last week, Iranian General Qassem Soleimani was killed in a targeted strike by U.S. forces authorized by President Trump. This preemptive attack has spawned a curious debate over whether Soleimani posed an imminent threat at the time he was taken out.

The suggestion, mainly by partisan Democrats, is that it was illegitimate for the president to use lethal force without congressional authorization absent proof that Soleimani was on the cusp of killing Americans — or, better, killing even more Americans.

The debate puts me in mind of the early-to-mid 1990s, when our counterterrorism laws were dangerously flawed. Back then, sensible Democrats — as most of them were — knew that these defects had to be addressed. Rather than sound like apologists for anti-American jihadists, they took admirably expeditious action.

SOLEIMANI FUNERAL STAMPEDE IN IRAN LEAVES AT LEAST 56 DEAD, STATE TV REPORTS

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER

The problem emerged in the investigation of the proto-Qaeda terror network guided by the so-called Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel Rahman. I was then a federal prosecutor and took over that investigation in spring 1993.

At the time, having just bombed the World Trade Center, the jihadists were actively plotting something even more monstrous: simultaneous attacks on the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels and the United Nations complex on Manhattan’s east side. The jihadists were also scouting additional landmarks in the city, including U.S. military facilities and the FBI’s downtown headquarters.

We knew about the plot — and were in a position to thwart it — because we had a confidential informant. (Back then, neither he nor anyone else got the sniffles over the media’s labeling him a “spy”).

Emad Salem, a former Egyptian military officer, had infiltrated the cell and covertly recorded discussions with the Blind Sheikh about the desirability of bombing U.S. armed forces. Like the Shiite Iranian regime (longtime supporters of Sunni Al Qaeda and Hamas, as well as Shiite Hezbollah), Abdel Rahman, a renowned Sunni sharia scholar, recommended that Muslims put aside their internecine conflicts when it came to fighting America, “the Great Satan.”

CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF THIS COLUMN IN THE NATIONAL REVIEW

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY ANDREW MCCARTHY

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Hunter Biden’s absence from Christmas photo stirs Twitter storm

Social media reaction had parallels with photo of Queen Elizabeth and some notably missing family members Source

Tourists book Turkish all-inclusive only to discover it is now a halal hotel after being taken over by Islamic owners who banned booze and introduced segregated pools for men and women

Tourists who booked an all-inclusive getaway in Turkey were shocked to discover the hotel had been taken over by Islamic owners who banned alcohol and introduced segregated pools for men and women.  Holidaymakers were drawn to Ova hotel, Oludeniz, by…

More than 150 injured after police, protesters clash in Lebanon’s capital

Police fired volleys of tear gas and rubber bullets in Lebanon’s capital Saturday to disperse thousands of protesters amid some of the worst rioting since demonstrations against the country’s ruling elite erupted three months ago. More than 150 people were…

Notre Dame Cathedral to be rebuilt as before — no modern twists

PARIS — Notre Dame Cathedral will be rebuilt just the way it stood before last year’s devastating fire. No swimming pool or organic garden on the roof of the medieval Paris monument, or contemporary glass spire, or other modern twists.…