The United Kingdom’s planned high-speed rail link between London and the nation’s north may not only speed up commutes but also the decline of rare and endangered plants and animals, according to a new report.

The Wildlife Trusts claims the 88-billion-pound ($114 billion) link, which is known as HS2, could destroy “huge swathes” of habitat, including 108 ancient woodlands.

The group, an umbrella organization for 46 smaller trusts that jointly manage 2,300 UK nature reserves, claims HS2 could damage hundreds of reserves and sites of special scientific interest and says the project, which is in mothballs because of cost overruns, must be rethought if it is restarted.

Nikki Williams, the Wildlife Trusts’ director of campaigns and policy, told the BBC: “HS2 will destroy precious carbon-capturing habitats if it’s allowed to continue in its current form. It will damage the very ecosystems that provide a natural solution to the climate emergency.”

And she said the project’s current provisions for habitat protection are “amateurish”.

“The figures are grim and the reality is worse,” she said.

HS2 Ltd, the company spearheading the project, insists the route will respect the environment and, in fact, create a green corridor. It says 9 square kilometers of new woodlands will be created between Birmingham and London that will comprise 7 million trees and shrubs. HS2 Ltd says it will relocate vulnerable animals away from construction sites into newly-created habitats.

But the Wildlife Trusts claims the mitigation work is inadequate.

Its report, based on information from 14 wildlife trusts impacted by the route, claims rare creatures, including the dingy skipper butterfly, could be wiped out in some areas, while barn owls, white-clawed crayfish, and other animals could be greatly impacted.

The Wildlife Trusts claims its review is the most comprehensive to date on the environmental cost of the HS2 project.

Hilary McGrady, director general of the National Trust, told the Press Association: “As Europe’s largest project of its kind, HS2 Ltd has a vital responsibility to lead by example and get this right by delivering a net gain for nature. We recognize that designing the railway is a long process but plans for HS2 must not end up cutting corners at the expense of the environment.”

Last week, revised estimates of the project’s cost predicted it could end up with a price tag of more than 107 billion pounds.

Despite the project’s champions claiming it will encourage less reliance on cars, trucks, and planes, some environmental groups, including Extinction Rebellion, have opposed it because of its impact on the environment.

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

WHO calls for emergency meeting as China confirms 4th death & person-to-person spread of new coronavirus

The upcoming WHO meeting, set for Wednesday, was announced on the heels of the fourth confirmed death from the novel coronavirus, which first broke out in the Chinese city of Wuhan but has since spread beyond, taking hold in Beijing…

Greece defends anti-migrant floating barrier amid growing criticism

The Greek government has defended plans to erect a floating barrier in the Mediterranean to deter thousands of people determined to reach Europe from making the sea journey from Turkey. Dismissing criticism, the country’s minister for migration and asylum, Notis…

US House to draft impeachment charges against Trump

Pelosi made the announcement on Thursday following a series of closed door meetings During hearing, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan punned on Barron Trump’s name to point out difference between presidents and monarchs Minor children of US politicians, particularly presidents,…

Hillary for VP is ‘speculation’? Bloomberg campaign brushes aside, but stops short of denying, Clinton ‘running mate’ claim

Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report claimed on Saturday that Bloomberg’s campaign considers the idea of a Mike/Hillary ticket a “formidable force.” Citing sources “close to” the campaign, Drudge said that Bloomberg would go as far as changing his official residence…