And another chunk of John Bercow’s legacy is chipped away…

His successor as Commons Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, has announced a new system for handling situations where the Chair makes a ruling that departs from Commons rules or traditions.

In his decade in the Chair, John Bercow stretched or, on occasions, shattered long-established conventions and the provisions of Commons standing orders.

Speaker Bercow’s rulings on apparently technical questions, like the number of amendments that could be allowed in a debate on the 2013 Queen’s Speech, the selection of amendments to supposedly unamendable “meaningful vote” motions and his interpretation of the meaning in standing orders of the word “forthwith” (which had previously meant that a motion was debated immediately, without the opportunity for amendments to be put) were all controversial, and the first two had serious repercussions.

It is arguable that his 2013 ruling, which effectively allowed Tory Brexiteers to put an amendment to the Queen’s Speech calling for an EU referendum, was the first pebble in the Brexit avalanche.

The power of the Chair to make such rulings is not exactly limited by the system announced by Sir Lindsay.

But it serves to highlight where a Speaker uses their power in a way that seems to go against the rules and conventions.

Sir Lindsay said that in the interests of transparency, he was creating a new system modelled on the power of accounting officers in government departments to “seek ministerial direction” when they believe they are being told to do something that is against the rules or outside normal policy.

In effect, they are requesting a written instruction, which would override their advice.

A similar procedure will in future apply where in the opinion of the Clerk of the House, the top adviser to the Speaker and the Commons, a ruling amounts to a substantial breach of Commons standing orders or of long-established conventions.

In those circumstances, the Clerk will be able to place a statement of their views in the Commons library, where it would be available to all MPs.

The effect would be to provide extra ammunition to MPs who wanted to challenge a controversial ruling by the Speaker.

The announcement was greeted by loud cheers, mainly from Conservative MPs, as it became clear that the Speaker was, sort of, renouncing Bercowesque powers to rewrite the rules and announcing a system which would, potentially, limit the powers of his office.

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Capitol’s physician to receive coronavirus vaccines for senior members of Congress, Supreme Court

The Capitol’s leading doctor will soon receive doses of the coronavirus vaccine to administer to the Supreme Court justices and senior members of Congress under a continuity-of-government plan crafted by intelligence experts. “Congress and the Supreme Court, along with executive…

New UK obesity plan fails to address underlying problems

Britain is often called “the fat man of Europe” but the whole world has an obesity problem – and some countries have taken more effective action than others. Chile recently imposed dramatic warning labels on foods with high levels of…

Rashida Tlaib addresses booing Hillary Clinton at Sanders event

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib booed former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton at a Bernie Sanders event Friday in Iowa. She addressed the incident hours later, saying in a statement she let her “disappointment” with Clinton’s recent comments about Sanders “get the best”…

Barr defends Justice Department against claims of politicization

Attorney General William Barr offered a forceful defense of the Justice Department’s independence on Wednesday amid criticism that its work has been leveraged as a political tool for President Donald Trump. “Where independence is most important and, in fact, essential…