(Reuters) – On the day of the Iowa caucuses, the first nominating contest of the U.S. presidential election, Alphabet’s YouTube detailed how it will tackle false or misleading election-related content.

The video-streaming service said in a blog https://youtube.googleblog.com post on Monday that it would remove any content that has been technically manipulated or doctored and may pose a “serious risk of egregious harm.”

It also said it does not allow content that aims to mislead people about voting, for instance telling viewers an incorrect voting date, or content that makes false claims related to a candidate’s eligibility to run for office.

The blog post also said YouTube would terminate channels which impersonate another person or channel, misrepresent their country of origin or conceal their links with a “government actor.”

Social media companies are under pressure to police misinformation on their platforms ahead of the November election.

In January, Facebook Inc said it would remove “deepfakes” and other manipulated videos from its platform, althought it told Reuters that a doctored video of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi which went viral last year would not meet the policy requirements to be taken down.

Major online platforms have also been scrutinized over their political ad policies. In November, Google, which is also owned by Alphabet, announced it would stop giving advertisers the ability to target election ads using data such as public voter records and general political affiliations.

It now limits audience targeting for election ads to age, gender and general location at a postal code level. Political advertisers also can still contextually target, such as serving ads to people reading about a certain topic.

Google and YouTube also have policies prohibiting certain types of misrepresentation in ads. However, when former Vice President Joe Biden’s campaign asked Google to take down a Trump campaign ad that it said contained false claims, a company spokeswoman told Reuters it did not violate the site’s policies.

While Twitter Inc has banned political ads including those that reference a political candidate, party, election or legislation, in a push to ensure transparency, Facebook has announced limited changes to its political ad policy.

Facebook, which has drawn criticism for exempting politicians’ ads from fact-checking, said it does not want to stifle political speech.

Reporting by Elizabeth Culliford in San Francisco and Neha Malara in Bengaluru; Editing by Anil D’Silva and Jonathan Oatis


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Top GOP pol accuses Pelosi of seeking ‘special treatment’ with salon visit; California gov mum on backlash

Pelosi claims she didn’t know it was illegal; William La Jeunesse reports. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Wednesday accused Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., of seeking “special treatment” during a recent visit to a San Francisco hair salon, despite local…

Hundreds of Chinese migrants detained at US border amid coronavirus-tied travel ban

Since October 2019, approximately 14,000 more illegal immigrants have been removed from the U.S. than arrived; insight from acting CBP Commissioner Mark Morgan. EXCLUSIVE: Since officials first reported the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan in late December and the United States…

Surging Steyer makes the debate stage, as new polls show sudden strength

California businessman and 2020 Democrat hopeful Tom Steyer has been flooding the airwaves with campaign commercials; Peter Doocy reports from Los Angeles. Tom Steyer appears to be moving up. The billionaire environmental advocate turned Democratic presidential candidate is soaring in…

Romney will vote to approve subpoena in Senate committee’s Hunter Biden probe

GOP senators ramp up Biden investigation; Homeland Security Committee chair Sen. Ron Johnson weighs in. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing a new Senate probe involving Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter that could be a thorn in the…