A sensible decision on the part of Boris Johnson’s government? Is that a greased piglet I see flying outside?

No it’s not. BoJo’s bozos have decided that statutory sick pay should be payable for day one, rather than forcing people who are self isolating as a result of fears they may have been exposed to the Covid-19 virus to wait for the fourth day of absence as is standard. 

They’ve got something right for once. Stopped clocks telling the right time twice a day and all that. 

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

There’s also been a belated move to declare the virus as a “notifiable disease”, thus allowing firms to claim on their insurance against losses caused by it. 

Ministers deserve rather less credit for that one because they dragged their feet by comparison to the devolved administrations in Scotland and Norther Ireland although, to be fair, the Association of British Insurers pointed out that in many cases the cover will be retroactive. 

Back to the main event, sick pay. 

In theory, the government’s move could potentially help to persuade more people to self isolate by making doing so less of a financial dilemma. 

Trouble is, the financial dilemma will still be there. Statutory sick pay is worth less than £100 a week, and requires a worker to be bring in more than £118 to be eligible (ruling out a lot of part timers). 

As was always the case, people with good employers and good sick pay schemes will have the luxury of staying home (and maybe working from there) if they feel the need. 

Those not in that fortunate position will likely be those less able to handle the hit they will take from moving to statutory sick pay for a couple of weeks, even with the extra few days (amounting to just under £80 in their pockets). Rent to pay? Loans? Mortgage repayments? Kids to feed? The dilemma will still be there. 

And there’s still no help for people in the gig economy other than the frankly contemptible suggestion that they apply for Universal Credit if they can’t work. 

Unison had the right of it when it described the sick pay move as “a good first step”. That it is. But, as the union pointed out, if you really want to slow the spread of the virus more is required because millions of people simply can’t afford to self isolate. Workers shouldn’t have to lose out for doing the right thing. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Trump looks to sign trade deal, show wins during impeachment

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is eager to show off a big policy win during his impeachment trial by signing into law a major rewrite of the rules of trade with Canada and Mexico. Trump made renegotiating the North American…

Asian stocks follow Wall Street lower on lack of US aid plan

BEIJING — Asian stocks followed Wall Street lower on Thursday as investors watched Washington for signs of whether political leaders can agree on an economic aid plan in the two weeks before the Nov. 3 presidential election. Market benchmarks in…

Bitcoin continues to break records after pushing through $40,000 milestone

Bitcoin spiked around 10 percent to reach the peak of $41,478, according to CoinDesk data, before paring some of the gains. It added to its value nearly $1,500 since it surpassed $40,000 for the first time ever on Thursday. However,…

Uniform financial standards to cut risks

Globally standardized financial risk management has become more important for financial services firms as China accelerates its opening-up efforts, and the country’s banking and financial systems look to remain resilient from the COVID-19 pandemic, said the chief executive of a…