A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday wrestled with the legality of sweeping congressional subpoenas for President Trump’s personal financial records, raising concerns about potential for “presidential harassment” as Congress asserts power to obtain the information for help drafting ethics and anti-corruption laws.

For more than 90 minutes by teleconference, the justices heard arguments from Trump’s personal attorneys challenging subpoenas from three Democratic-led House committees for a broad range of financial records held by private banks and an accounting firm.

The court also debated a New York grand jury subpoena for similar records sought by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance.

Chief Justice John Roberts worried openly that the House committees are claiming a “limitless” ability to request private documents of a sitting president.

Justice Stephen Breyer noted the subpoenas were seeking “a lot of information and some of it’s pretty vague,” adding that “there may be burdens” imposed on the president by forcing his banks and accounting firm to produce them.

“One [subpoena] could be manageable, but 100 [subpoenas] could be impossible,” said Justice Clarence Thomas of the potential aggregate impact of subpoenas on a president.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor defended the ability of lawmakers to issue subpoenas for broad legislative purposes. “One must investigate before drafting legislation,” Ginsburg said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Labour accuse health minister of insulting student nurses

Labour have accused a health minister of insulting student nurses after she wrote that ordinarily they were “not deemed to be providing a service” in hospitals. Helen Whately, the care minister, made the comments in a letter to a fellow…

Trust is essential in these times. But Boris Johnson is not a man to be trusted

Trust is the most precious commodity in any walk of life. The baleful fact is that the British government, in the midst of a profound and unprecedented crisis, is led by a man, and the party faction he represents, who…

Dagen McDowell says getting rid of private health insurance is now considered ‘moderate’ for Democrats

Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., is not a moderate, Fox Business anchor Dagen McDowell said on Thursday, calling out the Democratic Party for adopting policy proposals that are far-left. “If a moderate is somebody who supported getting rid of private health insurance…

Trump launches site to help people win arguments with “snowflake” relatives

The Trump campaign launched a website on Christmas Eve to help the president’s supporters win arguments with their “liberal snowflake” friends and family over the holidays. The website, aptly named snowflakevictory.com, gives Trump allies pointers for talking about a range…