Frogmen, or underwater military specialists like U.S. Navy Seals, are equipped with a number of different weapons optimized for underwater missions, and their smallarms are no exception. Conventional firearms don’t do well underwater—and neither do the bullets they fire. In this neat video, an AK-47 is shot underwater and you can see why doing so would not be very helpful during combat. Bullets made for firing above water experience huge amounts of drag, and have an incredibly short range—only five or six feet, or a little less than two meters.

Some firearms are optimized for underwater firing, however. So-called needleguns.

Needleguns

Needleguns function similarly to spearguns used for underwater fishing. The projectile they fire is long and thin, almost like a short knitting needle. The projectile is fitted into a conventional bullet case that has propellant and a primer.

APS Underwater Rifle

The APS superficially resembles an AK-style rifle. One of the most noticeable differences is the magazine, which is quite long and bulky. The large size is necessary to fit the 26 steel dart-like projectiles it fires. For improved accuracy and portability, the APS has a steel wire-type buttstock that collapses into the APS’ frame. Though this aids in portability, the APS is likely not so maneuverable underwater due in part to drag caused by the bulky magazine shape.

Range and accuracy are seriously dependent on depth. At increasing depths, the APS’ maximum range falls significantly, as does the rate of fire, thanks to additional hydrodynamic resistance against the assault rifle’s moving parts. On land, the APS is rather ineffective. For example, on land the barrel suffers from significantly greater wear.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, several post-Soviet countries inherited the APS, and may have produced their own variants.

ASM-DT

The APS was updated sometime in the 2000s. The result was the ASM-DT. Though similar, the ASM-DT has several improvements.

Because of the APS’ above water limitations, frogmen would carry both the APS for security underwater, and another weapon for use on land. This necessitated carrying two rifles and double the amount of ammunition. It was an imperfect solution. The ASM-DT was designed to address this very problem.

Like the APS, the ASM-DT fired steel dart-like projectiles underwater—but it could fire conventional bullets while on land. The ASM-DT could accept both AK-74 magazines, as well as the larger APS magazines, greatly simplifying logistics and reducing the weight that individual frogmen would have to carry. Unlike the APS, the ASM-DT’s barrel was rifled to improve accuracy when firing conventional ammunition from AK-74 magazines. Barrel rifling allowed the ASM-DT to expel water trapped in the barrel when firing on land, without risking catastrophic damage to the barrel.

Postscript

The Soviet Union designed some strange rifles, needleguns included—though they’re probably more likely to go up against sharks than enemy divers.

Caleb Larson holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics, and culture.

Image: Reuters

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Eurofighter vs. Russia’s Su-35 Fighter: Who Dies in a Shootout?

Here’s What You Need To Remember: There is no question that Russian jets have come a long way technologically since the end of the Cold War. The Su-30 and especially the Su-35 are excellent fighters—and they’ll be a handful for any…

The U.S. Navy Just Released Three ‘UFO Videos’. What Can They Tell Us?

It’s not every day that the U.S. government declassifies videos of UFOs. Especially not when such a release was spurred by the efforts of a member of the band Blink-182. According to Vice, the U.S. Navy has released three videos…

What If Japan Became a Nuclear Weapons Powerhouse?

Here’s What You Need to Remember: In the long view, the decision on Washington’s part to curtail Japanese nuclear ambitions played out well.  During the Cold War, the United States supported selective nuclear proliferation as a means of deterring a Soviet…

Why the Battle for Iwo Jima Was Especially Hard and Bloody

Key point: Taking the island was a step towards invading Imperial Japan itself. And yet the high cost led many to wonder if it was worth it. Roughly seventy years ago, on February 19, 1945, thousands of American Marines hit the…