New York (CNN Business)Staffers at The New York Times expressed dismay Wednesday over the newspaper’s decision to publish an op-ed written by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton that called for the U.S. military to be deployed in cities across the country to help restore order.

The op-ed was published in The Times opinion section, but staffers from both opinion and the newsroom — which operate separate from one another — publicly dissented.

A parade of Times journalists tweeted a screen shot showing the headline of Cotton’s piece, “Send In the Troops,” with the accompanying words: “Running this puts Black @NYTimes staff in danger.”

New York Times Magazine staff writers Jenna Wortham and Taffy Brodesser-Akner and the paper’s senior editor Kwame Opam were among the journalists who did that. National political reporter Astead W. Herndon tweeted his support for his “colleagues, and particularly the black ones.”

A spokesperson for The Times did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Running this put Black @nytimes staffers in danger. In solidarity with my colleagues who agree. pic.twitter.com/UfkZkE1xvj

Running this puts Black @nytimes staff in danger. pic.twitter.com/nI887cUYjQ

Supporting my colleagues, and particularly the black ones. if electeds want to make provocative arguments let them withstand the questions and context of a news story, not unvarnished and unchecked https://t.co/MwiD8BenzO

Amid the Twitter outrage, however, editorial page editor James Bennet posted a series of tweets on Wednesday evening to explain his decision to run the op-ed. He cited a number of previous pieces in which the editorial board and other opinion writers defended the protests and “crusaded for years against the underlying, systemic cruelties that led to these protests.”

But, he said, “Times Opinion owes it to our readers to show them counter-arguments, particularly those made by people in a position to set policy.”

“We understand that many readers find Senator Cotton’s argument painful, even dangerous,” Bennet concluded. “We believe that is one reason it requires public scrutiny and debate.”

Cotton’s op-ed argued that “local law enforcement in some cities desperately needs backup” and that the military “stands ready” to help.

The op-ed suggested the Insurrection Act be invoked, arguing that deploying the U.S. military into American cities “doesn’t amount to ‘martial law.'”

Throughout the day, Times staffers publicly revolted over the piece.

“I feel compelled to say that I disagree with every word in that Tom Cotton op-ed and it does not reflect my values,” tweeted Charlie Warzel, a writer for The Times’ opinion section.

“Christ,” tweeted tech reporter Mike Isaac.

“Exactly,” replied tech reporter Cecilia Kang.

This piece has led to a LOT of nyt slack conversations today 👀 (Opinion is wholly separate from the newsroom.) https://t.co/Pj5hCXkf95

i feel compelled to say that i disagree with every word in that Tom Cotton op-ed and it does not reflect my values. this piece does though https://t.co/Vrlw3NVtBH

exactly

Our own newspaper has reported that this is misinformation https://t.co/G2C3FIZPui pic.twitter.com/Xqc2twTKXm

Stacy Cowley, a business reporter, tweeted that the piece had “led to a LOT” of discussion on Slack, an instant messaging application that companies use to allow their employees to communicate.

Davey Alba, a tech reporter, wrote on Twitter that Cotton’s argument that members of Antifa were “infiltrating protest marches to exploit Floyd’s death for their own anarchic purposes” had been debunked by the paper

“Our own newspaper has reported that this is misinformation,” Alba tweeted.

A spokesperson for Cotton’s office declined to comment and referred CNN back to The Times.

Wednesday’s publication of Cotton’s op-ed isn’t the first time that the Times’ opinion section has generated criticism.

Bennet’s tenure has been marked by a series of high-profile blunders.

The Times’ opinion section was left reeling in September after it fumbled a story about an allegation of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The opinion vertical faced heat last summer for the actions of columnist Bret Stephens.

And last April, the opinion section apologized after publishing an anti-Semitic cartoon in its international edition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Maserati unveils its first supercar in 15 years

(CNN)Maserati unveiled its first supercar in 15 years Wednesday. With a body made largely from lightweight carbon fiber and aluminum, the new MC20 can hit a top speed of 202 miles an hour and go from 0 to 60 in…

No U.S. state avoided job losses in April: Labor Department

(Reuters) – Unemployment rates rose and total employment fell in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia in April as efforts to contain the coronavirus pandemic forced businesses to close across the United States, the Labor Department said…

Indigo Partners ties up with Oaktree for Virgin Australia bid: executive

SYDNEY (Reuters) – Indigo Partners is teaming up with Oaktree Capital Management in its offer for Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd (VAH.AX) and will consider adding an Australian partner as the bidding process progresses, Indigo managing partner Bill Franke said. “In…

China greenlights first wealth management unit of rural commercial bank

BEIJING – China’s banking and insurance regulator has given the nod to the establishment of the first wealth management company owned by a rural commercial bank. The southwest-based Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank has gained approval from the China Banking and…