Clive Tyldesley has written to the Professional Footballers’ Association suggesting co-commentators are given proper training after a study found “evident bias” in how darker-skinned players are described in broadcasts.
The study, conducted by Danish firm RunRepeat in association with the PFA, found that 62.6 percent of praise regarding a player’s intelligence was aimed at those with lighter skin, while 63.33 percent of criticism for a player’s intelligence was aimed at those with darker skin. The findings also show that 60.4 percent of praise for work rate was directed at lighter-skinned players.
The study looked at a total of 80 matches played in the Premier League, Italy’s Serie A, La Liga in Spain and Ligue 1 in France this season. It analysed 2,073 statements made by broadcasters speaking in English, working for media outlets in the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada.
As ITV’s main commentator, Tyldesley is one of England’s most recognisable voices, and he says that more training is needed to make those who take up the microphone more aware of what they are saying.
“I mentor media undergraduates. I discuss the business, the purpose of commentary with them – does anyone discuss that with the co-commentators who step straight off the field and pick up a mic?” he asked in a video posted on YouTube.
“Does anyone discuss with them the thought processes and the responsibilities that come with broadcasting? I’ve written to the PFA today suggesting that we set up some proper training, because co-commentators, ex-players, their members, may well have contributed to the stereotyping in these findings. Most of the opinions and judgments you hear during commentaries come from the co-comms, they don’t come from me, the lead comm.”
Tyldesley says he has known of the need to avoid stereotyping for some time and that preparation is not just about researching how many appearances a player has made.
“I’ve been made aware of the tendency that’s been described in this report at Kick it Out seminars for several years and anything that makes you think about how you commentate is good,” he added.
“I’ve always been mindful of this argument and being mindful is being prepared. You’ve seen how I prepare, but preparation isn’t all about neat writing, or facts and figures; it’s about thinking. Thinking what you’re going to say and how you’re going to say it, preferably before you say it. That is what this report is telling us commentators and co-commentators to do and I’m all for that.”
Tyldesley added that the report was the first time he has seen “in-depth analysis of any element of commentary” and made him realise how little feedback he gets beyond often-abusive Twitter mentions.
“Aside from all the cliches and the hype we’re accused of, we do try, or we should try, to use the language accurately and responsibly,” he said. “Racial stereotypes are not just wrong, morally wrong, they are inaccurate and they are irresponsible. They are lazy, thoughtless, and in my blown-up opinion, far too much sports commentary is lazy and thoughtless.”