It seems after all that the ministers won’t just be asking everyone to use their “common sense” or even just rely on manners to make people cover up.

After weeks of discussion about the relative benefits of covering your face when out and about, ministers are now likely to confirm that it will be mandatory to cover your face in shops in England as soon as Tuesday and like in Scotland seven days ago, expect that change to be brought in in law.

It is quite the shift. At the start of the crisis, the government’s scientists suggested that masks could do more harm than good.

There were nerves too about creating sudden demand from the public to get hold of medical grade coverings when there was a worldwide spike in demand as the pandemic took hold.

But more evidence has emerged about how coronavirus can be transmitted through the air.

Politicians are also keen to find ways to make consumers feel more comfortable going back out into the world, as the economy struggles to come alive again.

But things have changed a lot since the start of the lockdown when the government’s ‘stay at home’ message was heard loud and clear.

The vast majority of the public stuck to the instruction carefully. Millions tuned into the daily press briefings for the latest information, wanting answers, but wanting guidance too.

The expected decision to go ahead on face coverings comes after a scrappy few days when ministers have given different impressions in different interviews.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak appeared without a mask for the cameras serving food last Wednesday. Eyebrows were raised when he was chatting to customers over their vegan katsu without covering his face.

The Culture Secretary, Oliver Dowden, did mask up when observing Picassos in the Royal Academy the next day.

Then the prime minister donned his two quid mask in a photocall on Friday.

But on Sunday, Michael Gove made that call for “common sense”, and even this morning, the Justice Secretary, Robert Buckland, was saying coverings should be “mandatory perhaps” – a contradiction if ever there were.

Clarity, for shops in England at least, should come on Tuesday. But you wouldn’t be blamed for wondering quite what you are meant to do.

For the government’s critics it’s another example of ministers playing catch up after allowing confusion to spread.

During the early stages of the Covid crisis the public surprised politicians by being very willing to listen and follow the rules.

In this more complicated phase, any hint of a messy message could make them less likely to comply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Trump keeps kinda, sorta admitting he lost

On Wednesday, many House and Senate Republicans will press forward with an extraordinary and unprecedented effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election. They will be doing so with the express support of President Trump, who two months after…

VP Mike Pence expected to skip Trump send-off to Florida

WSJ Editor-at-Large Gerry Baker discusses whether President Trump will have a lasting influence on the Republican Party. Vice President Mike Pence is not expected to attend Wednesday morning’s farewell ceremony for President Trump at Joint Base Andrews, a source familiar…

Work has started on inquiry into N.S. mass shooting, public safety minister says

The commissioners conducting a full public inquiry into the April 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia have started their work, federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said today. They are in the process of setting up a secretariat in the province, hiring support…

Was the White House office for global pandemics eliminated?

“The Obama-Biden Administration set up the White House National Security Council Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense to prepare for future pandemics like covid-19. Donald Trump eliminated it — and now we’re paying the price.” —Former vice president Joe…