Here’s What You Need To Remember: One reason the U.S. military wants fuel-based warhead is because next-generation munitions will be smaller, which presumably means less space for both propellant and warhead, and thus an incentive to combine the two. The research proposal also speaks of the utility of dual-use fuels “particularly for air superiority,” which suggests that a fuel-based warhead would allow more smaller and more maneuverable air-to-air missiles.

The military uses explosives to blow things up. The military also uses rockets to carry those explosives to their targets.

So why not combine the two and create a rocket whose fuel also doubles as the warhead?

That’s the idea behind an Air Force research project to develop dual-use rocket fuel that also functions as a munition. The idea has precedent, though accidental and hardly desirable. NASA keeps gawkers miles away from the launch pad when it launches rockets from Cape Kennedy, because boosters powerful enough to send a spacecraft into orbit are also powerful enough to devastate the surrounding area if they explode (the explosion of a prototype Soviet Moon rocket in 1960 killed the head of the Soviet Union’s strategic missile forces). But the most famous demonstration of rocket fuel as a weapon came in the 1982 Falklands War, when the destroyer HMS Sheffield was sunk not just by the warhead of an Exocet missile, but also unignited propellant that set the ship ablaze.

RecommendedReport – U.S. Army is Now “Weak” 

Not surprisingly, what the Air Force wants is not just fuel that detonates like a bomb, but also detonates only when it’s supposed to. That’s no easy challenge. “While the energetic crystals within propellants and explosives are often similar indicating dual-mode potential, the formulations are different and optimized for their respective application,” the Air Force noted. Rocket fuel is designed to burn at a certain rate and over a broad range of temperatures (-65 degrees Fahrenheit to 165 degrees, according to the Air Force). Otherwise, the rocket spins out of control or explodes.

RecommendedRussia’s Battlecruisers Could Be a Super Weapon 

Interestingly, in an online Q&A with the Air Force, one company said it has a patent pending for a dual-use initiator that “has the capability to either initiate a rocket motor or detonate a warhead.”

But what’s particularly noteworthy about the dual-use fuel concept is how the Air Force foresees using it. One reason the U.S. military wants fuel-based warhead is because next-generation munitions will be smaller, which presumably means less space for both propellant and warhead, and thus an incentive to combine the two. The research proposal also speaks of the utility of dual-use fuels “particularly for air superiority,” which suggests that a fuel-based warhead would allow more smaller and more maneuverable air-to-air missiles. “This approach has the potential to alter the paradigm of missile/munition design since it increases system flexibility by allowing additional thrust control in the terminal encounter and/or utilizing the larger surface area of a case to mimic a larger warhead for either blast or fragment distribution near a target,” the Air Force said.

RecommendedReport – U.S. Army is Now “Weak” 

Phase I of the project calls for contractors to submit a formula for a dual-use propellant. Phase II involves a demonstration that would consist of “burning the material with a motor, extinguishing burn, and detonating residual energetic material.”

Michael Peck is a frequent contributor to the National Interest and is a regular writer for many outlets like WarIsBoring. He can be found on Twitter and Facebook. This first appeared in 2017.

Image: Flickr

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

With F-35s And KC-46A Tankers, Israel Can Hurt Iran Like Never Before

Here’s What You Need To Remember: If Israel does decide to bomb Iran, the U.S. government has made it a little easier. The U.S. State Department has approved an Israeli request to buy eight KC-46A Pegasus aerial tankers. Including support…

Why the Navy Is so Secretive About Its Special Seawolf Submarine

Key Point: The Seawolf class is rare and hard to find. They are expensive, but very useful and serve in dangerous and classified missions. Sometime apparently in August 2013, the U.S. Navy’s nuclear-powered attack submarine USS Seawolf eased out of the…

Browning Hi Power Pistol: A Real ‘Wonder’ Gun

Here’s What You Need To Remember: The Hi Power’s design, although ninety years old, is similar to the so-called “Wonder Nines” of the early 1980s. A simple to disassemble, reliable semi automatic pistol with a large capacity nine millimeter magazine, the…

Fact: More Than Sixty Countries Rely on This One Sniper Rifle

Key Point: The utility of the Barrett M82 sniper rifle has been repeatedly proven over numerous conflicts. One weapon system not only revolutionized the field of military sniping but also created an entire new category of weapon systems. Using an existing…