(Reuters) – Apple Inc on Friday alleged that Epic Games’ chief executive had asked it for a “side letter” to create its own game store within the iPhone maker’s App Store, which Apple said would have upended the store’s commission-based business model.

The disclosure came in a court filing Friday in which Apple asked a federal judge in California to deny a request by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games to be kept in the iPhone maker’s App Store as a dispute between the two over Apple’s in-app payment rules plays out.

Epic did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In a filing before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, Apple called the removal of “Fortnite” from the App Store earlier this month a “self-inflicted wound” that resulted from Epic knowingly violating Apple’s policies.

The company argued that Rogers should not grant Epic’s request for an emergency order to restore the game to the App Store.

Apple removed the popular game after Epic rolled out its own method of making purchases within the game, which Apple said violated its App Store rules. Those rules require games and other apps to use Apple’s in-app payment system, which charges commissions of between 15% and 30%.

Epic sued Apple over the removal, claiming the iPhone maker’s App Store rules violate antitrust laws.

Epic asked another federal judge to issue an order blocking Apple’s removal of “Fortnite” from the store, saying that the move – along with Apple’s threat to terminate the company’s developer account – would cause irreparable harm to Epic and should be put on hold while the case plays out. 

Epic said the termination of its developer account could also hamper its ability to offer a product called Unreal Engine, a software tool for computer graphics that hundreds of other games and other apps use to power their offerings.

“Epic knew full well that, in circumventing Apple’s processes and breaching its contracts, it was putting its entire relationship with Apple — including its Unreal Engine and other projects — at serious risk,” Apple wrote in its filing. “Epic made the calculated decision to breach anyway, and then run to this Court to argue that its customers were being damaged.”

Reporting by Stephen Nellis; Editing by Steve Orlofsky

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Shenzhen boosts mask production

Protective mask production capacity of Shenzhen, Guangdong province, will increase from the current 3.8 million units per day to 10 million by the end of this month, according to Li Zhong, deputy head of the municipal administration for market regulation.…

Ford will let you return your new car if you lose your job

(CNN)In an effort to appeal to customers worried about the uncertain economy, Ford will allow anyone who loses their job within a year of buying a new Ford car, truck or SUV to return it at no cost, the automaker…

China’s digital economy competitiveness 3rd in world

China took the third place globally in terms of digital economy competitiveness in 2019, following the US and Singapore. South Korea, UK, Japan, Finland, Sweden, Australia and the Netherlands ranked fourth to tenth, respectively, according to an annual report by…

Exclusive: France’s Engie eyes U.S. energy services firm Ameresco – sources

(Reuters) – French power utility Engie SA (ENGIE.PA) has approached Ameresco Inc (AMRC.N), a U.S. provider of energy efficiency solutions and developer of renewable energy plants, to express interest in acquiring it, according to people familiar with the matter. The…