Key Point: Experimentation inevitably results in failures.

It’s not usual for Russia to admit that its weapons have failed. Especially Russian media, purveyor of glorious stories of space MiGs and interplanetary tanks.

Yet Russia’s Sputnik News recently published an article back in 2018 on Russian and Soviet weapons that fizzled.

“For each military vehicle that is accepted into service, there are often roughly ten others that never proved to be either effective or economically viable,” Sputnik News tactfully reminded its readers. “However, they are not usually ‘born’ in vain – some of them are later used for the development of new generations of weapons.”

Sputnik News cited five examples:

The Papa-Class Submarine

The K-222 nuclear attack submarine (NATO code name “Papa”), launched in 1969, was considered the world’s fastest submarine. It reportedly reached a record speed of 44.7 knots. But only one model was ever built. “The problem with the K-222 was that its hull was built from titanium, which made it exceedingly expensive (it was even known by the nickname the ‘Golden Fish’),” according to Sputnik News. “Aside from this, the submarine was also very noisy, which stripped it of a key advantage — low detectability.” However, the article also claimed that it provided valuable lessons for subsequent Russian subs, such as the Charlie-class. Papa also encouraged the development of more advanced U.S. Navy anti-submarine weapons.

Su-47 Berkut

The Su-47 Berkut fighter (NATO code name “Firkin”), which first took flight in 1997, had distinctive forward-swept wings designed to increase maneuverability, longer range and faster subsonic speed. However, “such a design increased the stress on the wings, requiring much more expensive materials to be used in production,” Sputnik News said. “In combination with the slated completion date, 1997, at a time when the Russian economy was highly vulnerable, led to the closure of the project.” However, lessons from the project were incorporated into today’s cutting-edge Su-57.

The Black Eagle Tank

The Black Eagle tank (Russian designation Object 640), based on the T-80, caused a stir in the West when a few prototypes were unveiled in the late 1990s. In particular, it had a large, unmanned turret while the crew sat in the well-protected hull. If that sounds familiar, it’s because that’s a prominent feature of Russia’s new T-14 Armata tank, which has really caused a stir in the West. Sputnik News blamed the cancellation of the project on “a lack of innovation” with the design. Yet curiously, officials told Russian media in 2009 that the Black Eagle never existed as more than a prototype: “There was no such project…and those 20-year-old pictures show a mock-up of a futuristic tank which remained just a product of someone’s imagination.”

The Caspian Monster

One of the most distinctive craft in history, the Lun-class ground effect vehicle combined qualities of a conventional aircraft, seaplane and hovercraft. Dubbed the “Caspian Monster” when it was deployed in 1987, the sea-skimming craft—bigger than an airliner—was 243 feet long, sixty-two feet high, had a 144-foot wingspan and a speed of 297 knots. It could carry 100 tons of cargo or even six Moskit anti-ship missiles. However, it proved too expensive and only one was built. Nonetheless, its makers announced in 2015 that they were making a modern version.

The Soviet Slipper

The MiG-105, nicknamed “Lapot” (slipper), was an orbital spaceplane conceived in the 1960s as a Soviet response to the abortive U.S. X-20 Dyna-Soar project. Sidelined and then revived in the 1970s as a counterpart to the U.S. Space Shuttle, the spaceplane was attached to a liquid-fueled booster, which in turn was supposed to be launched in mid-air from a hypersonic jet. However, the craft made only made a few atmospheric test flights. “The project was terminated after a decision was made in favor of the rocket-propelled Buran orbital spaceplane,” eulogized Sputnik News. “The ideas behind the MiG-105 haven’t been used so far, but maybe one day its hour will come.”

Sputnik News is being generous in its epitaphs of weapons that ultimately proved to be expensive flops for the Soviet and Russian economies. Yet the United States is no different. How much of the American taxpayers’ money has been wasted on expensive dead-ends like the B-70 bomber or F-111 fighter?

Communist or capitalist, Russian or American, there is an iron rule: there can be no innovation without experimentation, and experimentation inevitably results in failures.

Michael Peck is a contributing writer for the National Interest. He can be found on Twitter and Facebook.

This article first appeared in 2018.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Is Iran’s Rag-Tag Speed Boat Navy a Real Danger?

Key point: These speed boats would die easily in a fight, but Iran has studied asymmetric war. Tehran knows its small boats can still cause damage through missile strikes. Iran has fielded a variety of unusual weapons over the years: F-14 Tomcat…

The U.S. Navy Might Run Out of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles

The U.S. Navy plans to upgrade a whole lot of Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles. Potentially more than a thousand of them. The rest, the service wants to dismantle. The result would be a much more capable, but potentially much smaller,…

MILITARY DRILLSRussian Pacific Fleet holds anti-terror drills in long-distance deployment

VLADIVOSTOK, May 14. /TASS/. The Pacific Fleet’s naval taskforce comprising the corvettes Sovershenny and Gromky held drills of anti-terror groups during its long-distance deployment to the Pacific, the Fleet’s press office reported on Thursday. “The personnel of the squad for…

How Do You Build The World’s Best Tank? Ask The Soldiers Who Drive Them

Here’s What You Need To Remember: The world’s armies are grappling with how to create new vehicles to replace aging tanks, such as the M-1 and T-72, that were designed during the Cold War. The problem is that the crews—that is,…