Undecided Wisconsin voters join ‘The Story with Martha MacCallum’ to weigh in on the 2020 presidential election.

More Wisconsin residents may cast their vote this November thanks to a federal court ruling on Monday regarding voter identification procedures.

A Wisconsin federal court ordered the provision to give greater protections to residents disenfranchised by the state’s voter ID law, as first reported by Democracy Docket reporter Mark Elias on Twitter.

The ruling applies to the ID Petition Process (IDPP), which can be used to obtain a receipt valid for voting while other documents or verifications are obtained. Voters will need a receipt that is valid for voting purposes.

The ruling on Monday stipulates how receipts should be mailed and it also requires the state to provide greater education opportunities as a means to prevent disenfranchisement.

FEDERAL APPEALS COURT HALTS WISCONSIN BALLOT-COUNTING EXTENSION

In order to obtain a voting ID, individuals in the state typically need to show proof of name and date of birth, proof of identity, Wisconsin residency, proof of U.S. citizenship and Social Security number. But if residents don’t have any or all of these, they can still get an ID for voting by filling out two forms, according to the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles.

The voter ID law came under scrutiny following the 2016 election, when it reportedly kept tens of thousands of registered voters from the polls, according to a study. Among individuals surveyed, 11.2% of eligible non-voting registrants were put off by the law. Six percent were prevented from voting because they lacked the appropriate form of identification.

Others were confused about the law, and actually had a valid ID form without knowing it.

WISCONSIN APPEALS COURT DECISION, INSISTS ABSENTEE BALLOTS RECEIVED AFTER ELECTION DAY SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED

Wisconsin is one of several states emerging as a key battleground arena for the 2020 election. President Trump bested then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton by less than 23,000 votes in Wisconsin in 2016.

Another recent ruling may also impact votes in the state.

As previously reported by Fox News, over the weekend a federal appeals court temporarily halted a six-day extension for counting absentee ballots in Wisconsin‘s presidential election.

As it stands, ballots will now be due by 8 p.m. on Election Day. A lower court judge had sided with Democrats and their allies to extend the deadline until Nov. 9. Democrats sought more time as a way to help deal with an expected historic high number of absentee ballots.

Fox News’ Andrew O’Reilly contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

To Democrats’ frustration, GOP predicts clear sailing as Barrett testimony ends

Senate Republicans predicted clear sailing for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett as she concluded her confirmation testimony Wednesday, and said she will forge a new and prominent path as a conservative, religious woman who opposes abortion. “There is nothing…

Supreme Court says government debt collectors can’t robocall cellphones

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday struck down rules allowing government debt collectors to use cellphone robocalls while banning all other groups using the same technique. Six justices said the government carve out in a 1991 law broadly prohibiting robocalls…

FOREIGN POLICYMoscow notes unscrupulous US attempts to accuse Russia of dangerous missile defense plans

MOSCOW, August 1. /TASS/. Washington is making unscrupulous attempts to accuse Russia of aggressive and dangerous intentions in the missile defense domain, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Friday. The Ministry said it had taken note of…

Tom Steyer is surging in South Carolina and Nevada. Does it matter?

Businessman Tom Steyer’s surprise gain in recent polls in South Carolina and Nevada is adding fuel to a debate in the Democratic Party about the ability of billionaire candidates to boost their profiles and place on the debate stage through…