At a World Trade Organization meeting in Geneva on Monday, it was confirmed that the US had lodged an appeal against a disputes court ruling in China’s favour

China had sued the US over the unilateral imposition of two rounds of trade war tariffs, but lack of appeal court means US appeal cannot be heard

The United States has lodged an appeal against a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling that some of President Donald Trump’s trade war tariffs on China were unlawful, according to a Geneva trade official.

The move was announced by the chair of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body at the start of a meeting in Geneva on Monday.

The US move effectively derails any action China might have taken against the dispute award, made in September.

The WTO’s appellate body – the Geneva body’s final appeal court –

, after the US refused to confirm any new judges in protest over perceived overreach in the court’s judgments. In WTO parlance, the case will now be “appealed into the void”, since there is no appeal court to hear it.

A disputes court panel ruled in China’s favour in September over unilateral US tariffs imposed on US$234 billion worth of goods in 2018 and 2019, after the US failed to convince the panel that the tariffs were legitimate under a “public morals” defence.

Additional WTO suits brought by Beijing over further rounds of US tariffs on China are still under review.

US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer lashed out against the ruling in September, saying: “This panel report confirms what the Trump administration has been saying for four years: the WTO is completely inadequate to stop China’s harmful technology practises.”

Thus, the US’ decision to appeal has not come as a surprise to trade watchers.

“With the Appellate Body no longer able to function, governments have the ability to appeal cases to prevent them from having legal effect. The US has done this before, and was expected to do this here,” said Simon Lester, a policy analyst at the pro-free trade Cato Institute.

“In terms of the practical effects of the US appeal, they are probably limited. Ultimately, the most a WTO victory can provide is authorisation to impose retaliatory sanctions,” Lester added. “But here, China already retaliated for the US tariffs at issue, so this WTO authorisation wouldn’t add much. It is more of a moral victory than a step towards US compliance.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Where women are kidnapped to be brides

Indonesian officials are vowing to end the controversial custom of bride kidnapping on the remote island of Sumba, after videos of women being abducted sparked a national debate about the practice. Citra* thought it was just a work meeting. Two…

Ghost ship washes ashore after more than a year at sea

Abandoned by its crew, the cargo vessel made a lonely odyssey across the Atlantic, a ghost ship seemingly destined never to make port. The 77-metre MV Alta drifted for over a year, skirting the Americas, Africa and Europe, rusting and…

MSNBC’s Anand Giridharadas: Americans’ ‘freedom obsession’ blinds them to other ‘threats’

Fox News media analyst Howard Kurtz breaks down NBC chief Andy Lack’s ouster. MSNBC contributor Anand Giridharadas declared on Wednesday that Americans have a “freedom obsession” when speaking about the coronavirus pandemic during an appearance on “Morning Joe.” “One of the fundamental…

IRGC admits responsibility for Ukrainian jet crash near Tehran, says Aerospace Force head

TEHRAN, January 11. /TASS/. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has taken responsibility for the Ukrainian plane crash near Tehran, Commander of the IRGC’s Aerospace Force Amirali Hajizadeh said on Saturday. “We admit full responsibility and are ready to follow…