An all-girls school fights back against New York Gov. Cuomo’s ‘crusade’ against the Jewish community; The Becket Fund Executive Director Montse Alvarado explains on ‘Fox & Friends Weekend.’

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration argued that religious gatherings were being treated “more favorably” than other gatherings in a Wednesday filing in response to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn’s petition to the U.S. Supreme Court seeking relief from attendance restrictions.

In the filing to Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer and obtained by Fox News’ Shannon Bream, Cuomo’s office noted “many of the state’s early cases were attributable to religious gatherings that served as super-spreader events.” Since October, New York has enforced capacity limits at houses of worship located in COVID-19 “clusters” in a bid to slow the virus’ spread.

ORTHODOX JEWISH GROUPS ASKS SCOTUS TO LIFT CUOMO RESTRICTIONS

“Instead, in implementing the Cluster Action Initiative, the state opted to treat religion more favorably,” the filing from Cuomo’s office said. “Specifically, rather than prohibit houses of worship located in red and orange zones from hosting gatherings altogether, Executive Order 202.68 allows such gatherings to occur, subject to limits on their size.”

“The order thus accords preferential treatment to religious gatherings in houses of worship, as compared with secular activities that present ‘a similar or greater degree’ of risk of COVID-19 spread,” the filing adds.

Religious groups of various faiths have accused Cuomo of enacting lockdown measures that are discriminatory. Under current New York state guidelines, houses of worship located in “red zones,” where COVID-19 clusters have been identified, are restricted to 25% of their maximum capacity or 10 attendees, whichever number is less.

Houses of worship in “orange” warning zones are limited to 33% of maximum capacity or 25 people, whichever number is less, while those located in “yellow” precautionary zones are limited to 50% capacity.

In an emergency filing earlier this month, the diocese asked the Supreme Court to block Cuomo’s lockdown restrictions. Diocese officials argued that businesses, both essential and nonessential, were permitted to operate without capacity restrictions in the same zones where houses of worship were subject to limits.

“Absent relief on an as-applied basis, thousands of the diocese’s parishioners in Brooklyn and Queens will continue to be deprived of their core free exercise rights on a daily basis until the matter is resolved in the lower courts,” the diocese’s filing said, “even though it is undisputed that the diocese has complied with all prior health regulations and operated safely without any COVID-19 spread since being permitted to reopen several months ago.”

In its response, Cuomo’s office said the diocese has “not demonstrated that any of the secular businesses or activities it identifies” have the “same COVID-19 super-spreader potential as indoor religious gatherings.”

As the presiding justice, Breyer has the discretion to make a determination on the case or refer it to the full Supreme Court for a review.

In a similar filing earlier this week, several Orthodox Jewish groups asked the Supreme Court to grant an injunction blocking Cuomo’s restrictions on attendance at houses of worship. The groups argue that Cuomo’s office had engaged in “the discriminatory targeting of the Orthodox Jewish community in crafting and implementing” the restrictions.

Breyer gave Cuomo’s office until Friday afternoon to respond to that filing.

Cuomo has faced intense scrutiny over measures his office has taken to limit the spread of COVID-19 since the pandemic began last March. His office has argued measure such as capacity limits at houses of worship are necessary to protect public health.

In October, five Orthodox Jewish institutions in New York City were fined $15,000 for violating restrictions on attendance limits.

While Cuomo has publicly criticized some groups that violated directives, the response to recent gatherings in New York City have clouded the state’s enforcement efforts.

In June, Cuomo praised protesters who marched against systemic racism following the death of George Floyd even as he called on the protesters to take precautions against COVID-19. More recently, authorities issued no fines for gatherings in celebration of President-elect Joe Biden’s win in the 2020 election.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Trump’s rhetoric on protests seen as detrimental by majority of Americans: POLL

A significant majority of Americans believe President Donald Trump‘s rhetoric on the unrest in parts of the country is making matters worse — with even members of his own party divided on his approach — a new ABC News/Ipsos poll…

Ben Carson hits back at Dems calling Trump a racist: ‘Nothing could be further from the truth’

Ben Carson, the secretary of the housing and urban development, on Thursday struck back at Democrats who have called President Trump a racist, saying they “could not be more wrong.” “President Trump does not dabble in identity politics,” Carson said during…

UK holidaymakers can visit just six overseas destinations without restriction

The UK government’s travel corridor list continues to be updated as Covid rates change, with many popular European holiday destinations removed in the last few weeks. UK arrivals from Turkey and Poland will face 14 days self-isolation from 4am on…

Mixed messages across the four nations

Nicola Sturgeon says she must extend the lockdown in Scotland to stop a resurgence of the virus. Because the rate of infection (the now famous R number) is still at or around one in Scotland, possibly slighter higher than in…