Here’s What You Need to Remember: Continuous-wave laser technology has been around long enough that the military has been able to ruggedize the system for use in the field. Over the last twenty years, pulsed lasers “have gone from requiring dedicated buildings at national laboratories to sitting on academic optics tables across the country,”

The U.S. Army wants a deadlier laser weapon that won’t just burn a target, but rather will slice it up.

Instead of low-power continuous-wave lasers that emit a steady stream of energy, the Army wants pulsed lasers that shoot intermittent but intense bursts that can quickly destroy a target. Pulsed lasers are already used commercially for precision cutting and etching.

How big a difference will this make? Consider this: the Army plans to mount 50-kilowatt continuous-wave laser weapons on Stryker armored vehicles by 2023. A kilowatt is 1,000 watts. The Army now wants to develop tactical ultrashort pulsed lasers with minimum peak power of one terawatt and a maximum of five terawatts. A terawatt is a trillion watts.

“Current high energy laser (HEL) weapon systems primarily consist of continuous wave (CW) laser sources with output powers in the kilowatts,” explains the Army research proposal. “These kilowatt-class CW laser systems predominantly engage targets via absorption of light; either causing the target to burn and melt or overwhelming optical sensors with high intensities.”

A key determinant in the effectiveness of laser weapons is how long the beam has to remain focused on the target. For the United States and other nations that are developing laser weapons to destroy fast-moving or hard-to-hit objects such as ballistic missiles or drones, the ability to deliver a quick, intense burst of energy on a moving target is vital. While CW lasers can be useful, “due to their fundamental different natures, lasers with pulse widths in the range of femtoseconds [one quadrillionth of a second] provide unique tactical capabilities due to their rapid discharge of enormous power,” the Army said.

A big advantage of pulsed lasers is that they can destroy or disable a target in multiple ways. “While most CW lasers simply melt targets, USPL systems are able to neutralize threats via three distinct mechanisms: ablation of material from the target, the blinding of sensors through broadband supercontinuum generation in the air, and the generation of a localized electronic interference used to overload a threat’s internal electronics,” the Army explains.

Pulsed lasers can instantly generate an immense powerful burst of energy, according to Dennis Killinger, a professor emeritus of physics at the University of South Florida. “The basic difference between CW and femtosecond laser pulses is that the instantaneous peak power within the 200 femtosecond pulse is about one terawatt, so that the instantaneous power is about a thousand billion times greater than the CW laser,” Killinger told The National Interest. “At this high peak power, the target material will be cut instead of burning, and the other advantages will be a filament guided beam and some plasma generation that could possibly affect electronics.”

Of course, there’s a catch. Continuous-wave laser technology has been around long enough that the military has been able to ruggedize the system for use in the field. Over the last twenty years, pulsed lasers “have gone from requiring dedicated buildings at national laboratories to sitting on academic optics tables across the country,” the Army notes. But pulsed lasers “while promising, still have many hurdles to overcome in SWaP [size, weight and power], relevant operating environments, and consistent mass manufacturing.”

Michael Peck is a contributing writer for the National Interest. He can be found on Twitter and Facebook. This article first appeared last year.

Image: Flickr.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

A 21st Century Battleship Could Be Just What The Navy Needs To Beat China At Sea

Key point: That’s where the battleship of the future comes in: it would give the United States a defensive option for limited conflict. In World War II, the Japanese super-battleships Yamato and Musahi each mounted nine 18.1-inch guns, the largest naval guns ever deployed, but…

Budget Time: How the Army Is Embracing out With the Old, in With the New

Key point: Every cut opens up new money to be used on other, more important projects. So what programs is the Army prioritizing? The U.S. Army is slowing, cutting and canceling hundreds of weapons programs in order to free up cash for…

North Korea’s New ICBM: Why the “Monster Missile” Matters

The large ICBM featured as the grand finale of North Korea’s military parade to mark the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Korean Workers Party has been a source of controversy and speculation from missile experts and amateurs alike…

Springfield Armory’s Hellcat 9mm: The Perfect (Small) Self Defense Gun?

When it comes to firearms the words “smallest” and “highest capacity” are often mutually exclusive—after all, how can a firearm be among the world’s smallest in its category and yet still have the highest capacity? This is possible when it…